Nothing waits.
Nothing leaks.
Nothing gets missed.
For managing partners, practice managers, and legal ops leads at small and mid-sized firms. Tell us how the firm runs, where work slows down, and what your team keeps handling by hand. We use that conversation to locate the likely leak and define the first paid workflow worth piloting.
New enquiries wait in inboxes while a competitor answers first.
AML and conflict pre-checks move slower than the client expects.
Deadlines live in someone's head or a spreadsheet nobody owns.
Invoices, disbursements, and unpaid balances need manual chasing.
Research, contract review, and first drafts eat associate hours at partner cost.
Two engines. One firm.
The admin desk keeps money and time from leaking. The legal bench makes the work itself faster and deeper. The judgment stays human — the coverage stops being human-limited.
Every enquiry answered before your competitor opens their inbox.
An intake agent qualifies the matter, runs conflict pre-checks, books the consultation, and follows up — in minutes, around the clock.
AML and conflict checks cleared in minutes, not days.
Party names extracted, screened against your registers and lists, packaged for human sign-off with the evidence attached.
No deadline silently dies.
Limitation dates, court deadlines, and undertakings pulled from filings and email into one watched calendar — escalated before they bite.
Invoices chased without a partner playing debt collector.
Time captured from email and calendar, narratives drafted, balances followed up politely and relentlessly until they clear.
Clients updated before they ask.
Matter status drafted from real activity, approved by a human, sent on schedule. Fewer “any update?” calls, calmer clients.
HR paperwork that files itself.
Onboarding, leave, appraisals, and CPD records collected, chased, and filed without a fee-earner touching them.
Every relevant statute section read — not sampled.
Research agents sweep the acts section by section — exemptions, caveats, transitional provisions — drawing only from verified sources.
Authorities that actually exist.
Case-law agents cite from official databases and licensed reports. Citations, quotes, and jurisdiction fit are verified before a lawyer relies on them.
Contracts reviewed against your playbook.
Terms extracted, deviations flagged, redlines proposed — a lawyer approves the position instead of hunting for it.
First drafts in minutes, from your own precedents.
The draftsman assembles from approved templates and matter facts. Your associate edits instead of retyping.
IP that renews itself on time.
Filings, renewals, and watch deadlines tracked to the day, with the evidence trail logged automatically.
Compliance checked against the client's actual business.
The proposed model is run against the rules that touch it — gaps surfaced early, before they become advice.
One measured fact. Simple multiplication.
Independent 2025 data puts the value of embedded AI at roughly $19,000 per lawyer, per year — and every figure here traces back to a single number that's already been measured.
Thomson Reuters (2025) measured it: AI saves a lawyer ~5 hours a week. Over a year, that's 240 hours back — per fee-earner.
Price those 240 hours as basic admin cost (~$30/hr, fully loaded) and it's ~$7,500. The undeniable number — the time you simply stop wasting.
Thomson Reuters prices it higher, because some freed time becomes billable legal work — and even then it's only ~$79/hr, a quarter of a lawyer's rate. Conservative, not hype.
$19k multiplied across a 9–10 lawyer firm. Smaller firm, smaller number — so we scope it per fee-earner, never one flat figure.
~$19k per fee-earner. Picture it across your firm — 5 is ~$95k, 10 is ~$180k.
And your support staff stop drowning in it too — that relief comes on top, at no extra count.
We haven't just made this up. The whole industry is reporting it.
Even without a law-firm case study of our own yet, the value is well-documented in 2025 — and our production system is live proof the engine delivers.
saved per lawyer per year — ~$19k in value each
more likely to grow revenue at firms with real AI adoption
of a lawyer's day is actually billable — the rest is admin we close
faster document review and processing with AI
The research coverage of a full associate bench — at a speed no bench can match.
Engine one pays for itself on admin. Engine two is the one you can't hire: exhaustive legal research a small firm could never staff, with your lawyer signing off before anything is relied on.
Every section, not a sample
Research agents sweep entire acts and regulations clause by clause — exemptions, caveats, transitional provisions — where a rushed associate skims.
Every authority, checked
Case-law agents draw only from official databases and licensed reports, then verify citations, quotes, and jurisdiction fit before a lawyer relies on them.
Hours, not weeks
Coverage that would take a bench of associates days, done in hours — so advice reaches the client while it still matters.
BigLaw depth, small-firm cost
The research firepower large firms buy with headcount, without the headcount — so you compete for work above your weight.
Coverage and speed, not judgment: the AI does the reading, your lawyer makes the call. Every output is built for human review before reliance.
One call. One workflow. Clear next step.
MAP THE LEAK
We identify the admin or legal workflow costing the most billable time this quarter — desk or bench.
CHECK THE BOUNDARY
We separate safe operational and research acceleration from anything that needs legal judgment.
SHOW THE FIRST BUILD
You leave with the first workflow we would automate, the review steps, and the likely return.
Built for legal buyers who ask hard questions.
DATA PROCESSING
We work around your existing systems and document where data enters, where it is processed, who can see it, and when it is deleted.
NO MODEL TRAINING
Client data is not used to train public models. Where AI reads firm material, we design for zero retention and tenant-controlled access.
DPA READY
For paid implementation, we can align the workflow to your DPA, internal AI policy, and matter-confidentiality rules before launch.
HUMAN APPROVAL
Outbound chasers, research memos, citations, escalations, and client-facing messages can require lawyer or operations approval before reliance.
Nothing important happens invisibly.
A cautious firm should be able to see what the system read, what it suggested, who approved it, and what reached the client. That is part of the build, not a bolt-on.
We hit the number,
or you don't pay.
The guarantee is stated in hours because hours are measurable and in your control. We baseline the hours your team loses to the work we take on — admin and legal — in week one, track them monthly, and you see the number the whole time.
One complete lane — admin operations or legal AI support.
Both lanes connected into one operating system.
A short time-audit sets your firm's current hours on the agreed admin and legal workflows. That number anchors everything.
We measure hours on the same agreed workflows and report the delta in plain numbers.
If we haven't hit the target by then, the monthly retainer is free until we do.
- Route the agreed work through the system — we can't save hours on work it never sees.
- Give the access needed: tools, data, and one named point person.
- Approve drafts within one business day, so nothing we prepare sits waiting.
- Sign the data-processing paperwork (DPA and, where relevant, SCCs) so we can connect legally.
- Don't restructure the team mid-pilot in a way that distorts the baseline.
The monthly retainer is what's on the line. The build fee is separate — it pays for a working system you keep and own.
- Boutique or medium law firm.
- Admin drag or slow legal work is blocking fee-earner time.
- You need practical AI governance, not a toy demo.
- You want automation run with your team, not dumped on them.